December 28, 2008

I'm not sure I should let you see this tattoo.

"Mildly NSFW."

13 comments:

Ron said...

The male version utilizes the weed whacker -- obviously!

Ron said...

It's the stick figures with the machetes near the armpits that are more disturbing!

gefillmore said...

much more sophisticated than one I saw quite a few years ago on a young woman across the top of her pubic hair-

'eat my p---y'-

I perform ultrasound scans and this was when I was doing abdomen and pelvic ultrasounds-

did not look too appetizing at the time-

George M. Spencer said...

Melvin Burkhart by Joel Peter Witkin

J said...

A stick figure drawn with a Sharpie qualifies as a tatoo now?

Jeff with one 'f' said...

NSFW? This is Sunday- more like NSFB (Not Safe For Brunch)!

Mark O said...

I'm not sure I should let you see this tattoo.


This must be the reason I can't open the link. Thanks for watching out for me.

Darcy said...

Clever.

walter neff said...

I knew she wasn't a real blonde!

Meade said...

In my line of work, that tat would be considered extremely safe for work -- good posture while employing OSHA approved tool use guidelines and USDA recommended pruning practices.

Except for one thing: the operator is not wearing ear and eye protection and, obviously, he isn't wearing safety pants. In fact, he doesn't appear to be wearing any pants at all. Not even underpants. Nor does he look as though he has taken his federally-mandated hourly 15 minute break.

So, yeah, Althouse should be ashamed of herself for publishing such smut. ASALP (and she, a law professor.)

NNSFW: Not nanny-state safe for work.

Peter Hoh said...

Meade, how about NSFNS -- Not Safe for the Nanny State?

J, I've often wondered how many tattoos (as presented on the 'net) are actually temporary markings. Is there a way to tell the difference?

Meade said...

Peter: that's good. We'll go with it. (And mow with it.)

Richard Fagin said...

Why, that tramp! The one pushing the lawn mower is supposed to be Tweety Bird, not a stick figure.